| 14. Short Bowel
Syndrome |
page
248 |
The
severity of symptoms following resections of large segments of the small
bowel relates to the extent of the resection, to the specific level of the
resected small bowel and to the reason for which the resection was
undertaken. The level of resection is important because absorption of
nutrients is most effective in the proximal small bowel (iron, folate and
calcium). Resection of up to 40% of the intestine is usually tolerated
provided the duodenum and proximal jejunum and distal half of the ileum
and ileocecal valve are spared. In contrast, resection of the distal
two-thirds of the ileum and ileocecal valve alone may induce severe
diarrhea and significant malabsorption even though only 25% of the total
small intestine has been resected. Resection of 50% of the small intestine
results in significant malabsorption, and resection of 70% or more of the
small intestine will result in severe malnutrition sufficient to cause
death unless the patient's malnutrition is aggressively treated.
The most common cause of massive resection of the small
bowel is small bowel ischemia, due to thrombosis or embolism of the
superior mesenteric artery, thrombosis of the superior mesenteric vein, or
low flow in the splanchnic vessels. Less commonly, volvulus, strangulated
hernias, Crohn's disease, neoplasm and trauma necessitate massive
resection.
Two major types of diarrhea can develop after massive
ileal resection. One is induced primarily by malabsorbed bile acids, and
the other by malabsorbed fat. When the ileal resection is small (less than
100 cm), hepatic synthesis of bile acids is sufficient to compensate for
increased fecal losses. The luminal concentrations of bile acids are
maintained within the micellar range, and significant steatorrhea does not
occur. However, with inadequate absorption in the terminal ileum, bile
acids enter the colon, impairing electrolyte and water absorption. Thus
the term "bile acid diarrhea" is applied to this circumstance.
When the ileal resection is extensive (greater than 100
cm), hepatic compensation for wastage of bile acids is incomplete and the
concentration of bile acids in the lumen is too low for adequate micellar
solubilization of fat. Steatorrhea results. Here the malabsorbed fat is
primarily responsible for the diarrhea. With excessive amounts of fatty
acids now in the colon, electrolyte and water absorption are further
impaired.
Consistent with these proposed pathogenic mechanisms
are the therapeutic observations that a reduction in the dietary intake of
long-chain fats will reduce the severity of diarrhea in the second
instance (extensive resection and steatorrhea), whereas a sequestrant of
bile acids such as cholestyramine, colestipol or aluminum hydroxide is
needed for effective therapy of bile acid diarrhea.
Additional metabolic complications arise from the short
bowel syndrome. These include hyperoxaluria and subsequent nephrolithiasis.
Normally dietary oxalate is excreted in the feces, bound to calcium as an
insoluble complex. However, in a patient with steatorrhea, fatty acids in
the intestine preferentially bind to calcium, leaving the oxalate soluble
and available for absorption in the colon. The short bowel syndrome may
also give rise to cholelithiasis. If bile acid malabsorption is extensive,
a lithogenic bile will be produced, predisposing to gallstone formation.
|